TRAVIS COUNTY, Texas — For some in Travis County, there will be two Proposition An’s on the November voting form.
- Voters will choose water preservation region
- There is currently more strain on Trinity Aquifer
- Restricted supply of water and appeal
While one arrangements with subsidizing for the Travis County Expo Center, different arrangements with building up a water preservation locale for southwest bits of the district.
About 30 years back, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality assigned five provinces, notwithstanding segments of three different regions, as a feature of the Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area (PGMA), including southwestern Travis County. Analysts have confirmed that territory, alongside eight other examination zones, either have or are required to have conceivable groundwater deficiencies inside the following 50 years.
As development proceeds in Travis County, analysts state there is more strain being put on the Trinity Aquifer, which gives the territory groundwater. Out of the Hill Country PGMA, just southwestern Travis County stays without a groundwater preservation locale (GCD).
Richard Scadden, board individual from the proposed Southwestern Travis County Groundwater Conservation District (SWTCGCD), said so as to keep up the development being found in the region, the water supply needs to keep on being reasonable.
While surface water use is managed by the state, groundwater has normally been liable to the “rule of capture.”
“Which means that anyone can extract as much water from beneath their own property as they want, and that’s fine, as long as there’s plenty of water to go around,” said Scadden. “But as water becomes more scarce, it needs to be managed more thoughtfully than that, and this groundwater conservation district has the authority to do so.”
“There’s a limited supply and a high demand,” said Robin Gary, instruction facilitator for the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District (BSEACD).
Travis County employed BSEACD to assist lead with inquiring about on the groundwater circumstance in their piece of the Hill Country PGMA.
“We’ve done site visits, we’ve compiled existing data, we’ve gone through and gotten geophysical logs and drilled monitor wells, and established new monitor sites, which was all very needed,” said Gary.
“This establishes a good baseline of science information so that the policy makers can have a sound basis for making their decisions.”
Gary said notable information recommends that water levels in the lower and center Trinity Aquifers have been dropping as much as 2 feet for each year since the late 1950s/mid 1960s.
While the objective of the proposed GCD is to advance great stewardship of what scientists recommend is a constrained asset, some like Bee Cave board part, Jon Cobb, question the gathering’s intentions.
“There’s never been a groundwater district in the state that’s ever saved any water,” said Cobb.
Cobb accepts the GCD will just include another degree of administration. He’s likewise worried about the expense.
“One of the problems with the groundwater, the proposed groundwater district, is that how are they going to pay for it,” questioned Cobb.
“The people that are proponents of the groundwater district will say is ‘well it’s not going to raise your taxes.’”
The GCD may not raise your assessments, however it would make client charges for high-water clients, as indicated by the protection region’s site. That would incorporate clients of water system wells, similar to fairways, mechanical and rural clients, just as open use providers like water control and improvement locale (WCIDs) and metropolitan utility regions (MUDs).
The client expenses haven’t been made permanent yet, anyway GCD advocates guarantee they shouldn’t be extremely high.
On the off chance that voters support the SWTCGCD, the protection region will at that point have the option to draft an administration intend to set up strong standards, guidelines and expenses and figure out who they’ll really apply to.
As per a proposed SWTCGCD map, the GCD would cover all of southwestern Travis County, including a little part of Austin. Anyway certain networks like Bee Cave, Lakeway and Village of the Hills would all be absolved on the grounds that those urban areas utilize surface water instead of groundwater — anyway individuals in those networks will even now be able to decide on the issue.
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Enviro Magazine journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.